Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Taser wriggles free of majority of $6.2 judgment

On Fool.com [LINK]

I read somewhere else that this decision had more to do with a point of law about punitive damages in California not being provided on 'Failure to Warn' cases than any sort of moral victory.

More later when I find any further details.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments from Taser International Inc. or their sock-puppets will not be published, but will be investigated. If you have a good pro-taser argument, then go start your own blog (they are free). Comments are moderated. And Google now automatically filters out comment spam.