The victim was just 17 years old.
Many commenters are missing the point: The police were told that the taser is safe. Not that it was safer than a gun (an easy comparison), but 'safer than Tylenol'.
If the police had realized that a deployment of a taser might lead to a death, then they might have considered other options. It is not reasonable to assume that they would have immediately used a gun.
In this case, even if lethal force could be justified, the main issue is that we have a death that appears to be (according to the limited reports) very closely associated with the taser deployment. And Taser will claim that there is no connection.
I think that Taser's position is self-serving and self-evidently perposterous. But that's just my opinion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment