Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Taser International's own "Dr." Mark (not an MD) Kroll meddling in taser death investigations
"Dr." Mark Kroll (not an M.D.) "...has helped law enforcement with many similar cases around the country and asked me to send an arrest-related death evidence outline that he developed,” Carns wrote. "While not necessarily relevant to this case, I have also attached an excited delirium check list he developed and published with several excited delirium experts." [LINK]
Sleazy.
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Liverpool, UK - 22-year-old man hit with taser, suffers cardiac arrest
Hey Kroll, you've been pretty quiet lately.
[LINK]
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Macadam Mason death caused by taser
An electrical discharge from a Vermont state trooper’s Taser weapon caused the death of a Thetford man three months ago outside his home, the New Hampshire Medical Examiner’s Office advised Vermont State Police Friday. Macadam Mason, 39, suffered “sudden cardiac death due to conducted electrical weapon discharge,” Vermont State Police reported late Friday afternoon in a statement relaying the conclusions from Mason’s autopsy in New Hampshire. Mason died June 20 outside his Thetford home after Senior Trooper David Shaffer fired his Taser at Mason’s chest. ...[LINK]
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Forbes: "Taser remains 'an execution story'."
... J.P. Morgan analyst Paul Coster... ...writes in a research note that Taser remains “an execution story,” ...Yes. Sometimes that's exactly true.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Macadam Mason taser-death autopsy report overdue
WHO'S HOLDING UP AUTOPSY OF VERMONT MAN'S TASER DEATH IN JUNE? [LINK]
None of the officials involved in Vermont's first taser death will explain why it's almost three months since a Vermont State trooper tasered Macadam Mason, a 39-year-old epileptic artist who died almost immediately, and there's still no completed autopsy report. ...
Monday, September 10, 2012
How Taser International meddles in taser-death medical inquiries
Taser writes investigators, medical examiner, in death of Thetford man [LINK]
The day following Macadam Mason’s death, Vermont State Police held a news conference and said, in part, that the Thetford man died after being shot in the chest by a Trooper’s Taser. Less than four hours after the conference, a Taser International spokesman e-mailed State Police suggestions on how to conduct its investigation and asked the agency to forward information to the medical examiners conducting an autopsy on Mason’s body. “The attending medical examiners should urgently know that the University of Miami [a.k.a. Excited-Delirium-R-Us] Brain Endowment Bank is available with cutting edge research center that can determine drug abuse and look for excited delirium markers,” Taser International spokesman Steve Tuttle wrote in the e-mail. ...
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
The Trial Lawyer's Guide To Taser Lawsuits
The Trial Lawyer's Guide To Taser Lawsuits [LINK].
Contains details and advice for lawyers considering and evaluating these types of cases.
Contains details and advice for lawyers considering and evaluating these types of cases.
Monday, June 11, 2012
Warren Police Department drops Tasers after shocking letter from manufacturer
...After receiving an email that X26 and M26 Tasers more than 5 years old with certain serial numbers are past the recommended "deployment lifecycle"... Police officials said their review found that the Tasers were used unsuccessfully 23 percent of the time they were used by Warren officers... [LINK]Did they mention "deployment lifespan" when they sold them to you? How long did you think that a cheaply-made plastic gun was going to last? Stun Gun salesmen... Have they got a deal for you...
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Tracing false logic to the likely source
In Grimolfson's case, "a few minutes passed, not seconds, from the time of last Taser use to time of unconsciousness; therefore, the Taser use is not a relevant factor," the judge wrote.This claim can probably be traced back to "Dr." (not an MD last time I checked) and Taser International insider Mark Kroll. Kroll has been wrong multiple times on the subject of taser safety. His infamous "Cardiac Safety" ping-pong paper webpage was silently withdrawn from the Taser International website. Kroll consistently denied that tasers could cause death, now it's an established fact that tasers can and do cause and contribute to death. The Judge's statement is not supportable except by reference to "expert" speculation by those that have been wrong many times before. Many taser associated deaths have followed the pattern of: tasered, difficulty breathing, lack of response, and death several minutes after the taser hit. The likely mechanism is arythmia, but it's not my place to make uninformed speculation.
Monday, June 4, 2012
Constitutional attorney & author John W. Whitehead lays it all out
This item pretty much covers it. LINK
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
American Heart Association: Tasers can be cause of death
Scottsdale, AZ - An article just published by the American Heart
Association's premier journal, Circulation, presents the first ever
scientific, peer-reviewed evidence that tasers can cause cardiac arrest and death. ... The conclusions of Dr. Zipes' article, which looks at
eight cases involving the Taser X26 states: "ECD stimulation can
cause cardiac electric capture and provoke cardiac arrest resulting from
ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. After prolonged
ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation without resuscitation,
asystole develops." ...[LINK]
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Sheriff's Sgt sentenced to 5 years for taser-as-punishment
Birmingham, AL - Former Tuscaloosa County sheriff's sergeant Althea Mallisham was sentenced today to five years in prison on federal charges that she wrongfully used a Taser as punishment on prisoners on three separate occasions in 2008. ... [LINK]
Saturday, April 7, 2012
'Papa' Phillips W. Smith-4-Brains loses house
Papa Phillips W. Smith-4-Brains loses house [LINK]
Fancy house built in 2009, but he couldn't afford to keep it.
Tom's gone AWOL. Pappa suffering financially.
Karma's a bitch, eh?
See also [LINK].
$10,500,000. M56 Place LLC, a New Mexico limited-liability company, paid cash for a seven-bedroom, 10-bath, 17,015-square-foot home, which includes a 1,854-square-foot guesthouse and 3,000-square-foot pool, built in 2009 on nearly 5 acres at Mummy Mountain Estates in Paradise Valley. ... The home was sold by BMO Harris Bank of Milwaukee, after original owner Phillips W. Smith returned it to the bank to avoid foreclosure. In 2001, Smith bought Taser International Inc. He has been chairman emeritus of Taser since October 2006 and served as its chairman until then.
Fancy house built in 2009, but he couldn't afford to keep it.
Tom's gone AWOL. Pappa suffering financially.
Karma's a bitch, eh?
See also [LINK].
... 35,000-square-foot mansion in Paradise Valley sold for $10.5 million... The house, situated on 5 acres, was once owned by Phillips Smith, former chairman of Taser International. He gave the home back to lender M&I Bank in 2011. ... The house was originally listed for $20 million, and then lowered to $15.9 million. ... Smith lived in the home and maintained it until the sale... [in late-March 2012]
Taser expert (LOL) opens mouth to reveal empty head
Taser almost certainly triggers fatal car fire [LINK]
Arroyo speaks nonsense. What? Gasoline is now not flammable?
The air-fuel mixture need not be "perfect", it need only be reasonable. Claiming that gasoline fumes are not flammable unless the air-fuel mixture is perfect is utterly stupid. If flammable substances similar to gasoline fumes are present, then a taser spark would ignite them almost every time.
"Not probable" my ass.
Even Taser International clearly warns against this.
If Arroyo has a "certificate" from Taser International, it should be revoked. He's obviously not reading the f-ing manual.
..."The possibility is there, but it has to be what we call 'the perfect storm'… the perfect fuel-to-air-to-spark ratio," said Keiko Arroyo, who is the chief instructor at Absolute Tactical Training in University Heights. "It would have to be the right amount of gas and fume mixture in the air to set it off… It's possible, but probably not probable."
Arroyo speaks nonsense. What? Gasoline is now not flammable?
The air-fuel mixture need not be "perfect", it need only be reasonable. Claiming that gasoline fumes are not flammable unless the air-fuel mixture is perfect is utterly stupid. If flammable substances similar to gasoline fumes are present, then a taser spark would ignite them almost every time.
"Not probable" my ass.
Even Taser International clearly warns against this.
If Arroyo has a "certificate" from Taser International, it should be revoked. He's obviously not reading the f-ing manual.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
"This one will stick."
First posted WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 2011:
The judgment was reduced to about $4M, but the legal findings and the fantastic legal loss stand.
Tasers can kill. Through various mechanisms.
Taser International knew about these risks, but failed to warn.
They're heavily liable in who-knows-how-many other cases. Case law has been established.
Taser International found liable in killing of Darryl Turner
Taser International, manufacturer of potentially lethal stun guns, was found partially responsible for the death of 17-year-old Darryl Turner after police in Charlotte, N.C., used a Taser device on him during an altercation at a grocery store on March 21, 2008.
Mr. Turner was young and in generally good health, was tasered and was dead almost immediately.
Taser International was ruled responsible for about $9.23 million of the total award; about $6 million of that will be covered by insurance. The city of Charlotte will cover $730,000 as part of a settlement, and $40,000 will be covered by workers’ compensation insurance.
The $3M+ judgment not covered by their insurance consumes their potential profit for even a good year; and that's going to bite very hard. The next pain they feel will be when their insurance carrier(s) realize that this is the new trend. The third pain will be when the investors (a.k.a. morons) read about this and start complaining.
I've not been posting much recently, primarily because I've been waiting for this day.
Taser International can appeal this judgment all they want. The cold hard fact remains that their "safe" product killed Darryl Turner directly.
This one will stick.
The judgment was reduced to about $4M, but the legal findings and the fantastic legal loss stand.
Tasers can kill. Through various mechanisms.
Taser International knew about these risks, but failed to warn.
They're heavily liable in who-knows-how-many other cases. Case law has been established.
Court upholds ruling: Tasers kill
Taser International "...knew its weapon could kill..."
A legal blow to the maker of Tasers as controversy grows over the weapon's safety.
Taser International lost its appeal Tuesday in the most costly case against the company to date. Last summer, a jury awarded the family of Darryl Turner, who died after being tasered, $10 million, ruling that TASER knew its weapon could kill and did not properly warn police.
On appeal, the U.S. District Court Western District of N. Carolina Charlotte Division ruled in favor of the plaintiff on all objections, but did rule the damage award “excessive" and reduced it in half to $5 million. "This is a huge victory for safety," said plaintiff attorney John Burton, "…and people concerned that this device is being given to police with false assurances of its safety." Burton added, "The judge viewed the evidence and said the jury was justified in its conclusion." Dr. Douglas Zipes, an electrophysiologist who testified for the plaintiff that Tasers could kill, said the reduction of the award was fair, and that the court's ruling "totally vindicates what we said, that Taser causes sudden death and the judge accepts that concept." There has been no comment yet from Taser International. ... MORE-> [LINK]
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Cpl. Benjamin Monty Robinson found guilty of Obstruction
Cpl. Benjamin Monty Robinson was found guilty Friday of obstruction of justice in connection to a fatal traffic accident in which he was involved while off duty. [LINK]
Robinson is one of four officers charged in the death of Robert Dziekanski, who was jolted several times with a Taser at Vancouver's airport in 2007. All four are scheduled to stand trial on Perjury charges in 2013.
Robinson is one of four officers charged in the death of Robert Dziekanski, who was jolted several times with a Taser at Vancouver's airport in 2007. All four are scheduled to stand trial on Perjury charges in 2013.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Tom Smith-4-Brains resigns from Taser Board of Directors
If I'm getting the news correct, then he's still going to be CEO.
His place in history:
Taser International under Tom's watch. [LINK]
His place in history:
Taser International under Tom's watch. [LINK]
Saturday, February 4, 2012
Braidwood on "excited delirium"
In a 1,000-page report, Braidwood concluded... [LINK]
This conclusion is perfectly clear.
... It is not helpful to characterise people displaying these behaviours as suffering from "excited delirium". Doing so implies that excited delirium is a medical condition or diagnosis, when mental health professionals uniformly reject that suggestion.
Assigning responsibility to such symptoms (in the guise of a diagnosis) conveniently avoids having to examine the underlying medical condition or conditions that actually caused death, let alone examining whether use of the conducted energy weapon and/or subsequent measures to physically restrain the subject contributed to those causes of death. ...
This conclusion is perfectly clear.
BBC FileOn4: Deaths involving police restraint
BBC audio PodCast webpage [LINK]
In the podcast (starting at about 6m00s into the podcast), Dr. 'Excited Delirium' Mash describes a typical "excited delirium" death as a long sequence of events, eventually leading to the police applying restraint, and "...the next minute they're dead."
That's exactly what she said.
Dr. Mash has repeatedly claimed that deaths following this sequence are "caused" by the underlying symptoms, and that the police restraint is not a cause of death. Her unproven theories regarding "excited delirium" have been used to take the focus off of police restraint techniques and how some are potentially more dangerous than others.
She then explains (at 6m30s), "...proximity is not causality...".
The obvious logical error that she makes here is that close temporal proximity - combined with consistent ordering (restraint -> death) - clearly does imply causality.
If these subjects are about to die "...the next minute...", then the police are too late to save the subject's life. They should, regrettably, stand back for the additional minute and allow the person to die without police putting themselves into legal jeopardy by applying restraint during the death.
(NOTE: The above paragraph is a Reductio Ad Absurdum and is intended to demonstrate that theory being proposed by Dr. Mash is absurd.)
Dr. Mash is not so thick that she doesn't understand cause-and-effect and inductive logic. So why does she ignore basic logic? Why indeed...? Why are there strange links between her and Taser International? [LINK]
To be clear - I have no explanation and I'm not implying anything. I'm just pointing out that her logic is twisted into nonsense, and her conclusions about excited delirium as a purported cause of death are extremely "unhelpful".
Deaths involving police restraint under-reported in UK [LINK]
Why are police restraint-associated deaths in the UK being under-reported?
Why do they propose to delay (for an entire year) providing a correct report?
In the podcast (starting at about 6m00s into the podcast), Dr. 'Excited Delirium' Mash describes a typical "excited delirium" death as a long sequence of events, eventually leading to the police applying restraint, and "...the next minute they're dead."
That's exactly what she said.
Dr. Mash has repeatedly claimed that deaths following this sequence are "caused" by the underlying symptoms, and that the police restraint is not a cause of death. Her unproven theories regarding "excited delirium" have been used to take the focus off of police restraint techniques and how some are potentially more dangerous than others.
She then explains (at 6m30s), "...proximity is not causality...".
The obvious logical error that she makes here is that close temporal proximity - combined with consistent ordering (restraint -> death) - clearly does imply causality.
If these subjects are about to die "...the next minute...", then the police are too late to save the subject's life. They should, regrettably, stand back for the additional minute and allow the person to die without police putting themselves into legal jeopardy by applying restraint during the death.
(NOTE: The above paragraph is a Reductio Ad Absurdum and is intended to demonstrate that theory being proposed by Dr. Mash is absurd.)
Dr. Mash is not so thick that she doesn't understand cause-and-effect and inductive logic. So why does she ignore basic logic? Why indeed...? Why are there strange links between her and Taser International? [LINK]
To be clear - I have no explanation and I'm not implying anything. I'm just pointing out that her logic is twisted into nonsense, and her conclusions about excited delirium as a purported cause of death are extremely "unhelpful".
Deaths involving police restraint under-reported in UK [LINK]
Why are police restraint-associated deaths in the UK being under-reported?
Why do they propose to delay (for an entire year) providing a correct report?
Friday, January 27, 2012
Taser Quote of the Month - 'not quite as safe as I thought'
I don't think they are quite as safe and useful as I once believed. Const. Daniel Dickhout [LINK]
Tasers continue to be marketed under false claims of safety. Marketing claims that are contradicted by the company's legal fine print.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Taser International on the losing end of legal battles with Karbon Arms
File under: LOSERS
25 January 2012 - Karbon Arms ... prevailed [over Taser International] in the U.S. District Court. ...Taser International [had] falsely accused Karbon Arms of violating a court ordered injunction. Karbon was vindicated of the baseless allegation by Rick Smith, Taser's CEO, that Karbon is "seeking to evade the Court's injunction through subversive means." ...In addition to this victory, in December 2011, the U.S. Patent Office completed a re-examination of Karbon's patent number 7,778,005 and found in favor of Karbon Arms. Taser requested this re-examination in May 2011. ... [LINK]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)